Jon Udell Takes The Long View on Longhorn

After weeks of trying research, floating his thoughts on his blog and taking feedback from the blogging community (including several Microsoft folks), Jon Udell has posted an Infoworld article digging into the pillars of Longhorn (Avalon, Indigo and WinFS) and grading them on their implications. He summarizes nicely, I think:

"Indigo, by virtue of its developer-friendly simplification of Web services protocols, could propel Microsoft into the forefront of enterprise middleware. Although Longhorn's use of Indigo will focus on networks of Windows peers, the technology isn't bound to Longhorn. Expect to see Indigo-powered 'enterprise service bus' offerings from Microsoft and partners."

"If WinFS succeeds in delivering improvements in users' ability to organize and manage local information, enterprises looking to drive productivity up -- and support costs down -- will want it. The wild card will be the level of support for legacy document formats and emerging XML formats. Benefits that accrue only to new WinFS-aware applications won't tip the scale."

"Avalon's TV-like 'presentation experiences' clearly favor the home entertainment center over the business desktop. An accelerated convergence of voice, video, and data could alter that equation, and Avalon is designed to help drive that convergence. But enterprises concerned about reach and lock-in will need to carefully evaluate the trade-offs."

I think that Jon's nails the tensions involved in Indigo and WinFS, but misses the boat on Avalon, which represents a much-needed overhaul of our aging presentation sub-system and enables a host of applications that we need to visualize and manipulate the ever increasing amount of data with which we deal. Of course, the existing presentation stack will continue to work just fine, but for those applications that need it, Avalon will be a god send. As we progress over the next decade, more and more apps are going to need what Avalon provides.

However, while I don't agree with every that Jon says, but I do appreciate the thoroughness that went into his opinions. Folks involved in Longhorn, both inside and outside of Microsoft, should take a look.

Comment Feed 7 comments on this post

Chris Sells:

Very weird. I read the article this morning.

Wednesday, Jul 21, 2004, 11:14 AM


Have not read it, but Udell seems to miss the boat, as I see it any way, about the potential for WinFS.
It is very possible, maybe likely, that WinFS will not fulfill its potential, but in a perfect world, WinFS would lead to a world where all applications leverage the existing schemas -contacts are contacts, and they are extended for specific apps,but more importantly, domain specific schemas emerge [not without pain] in all manner of line of business applications, creating a rich repository of WinFS schemas that will collaborate with other applications in the same business.

Tuesday, Aug 3, 2004, 7:19 AM

bilcqt gpkdl:

aqonb pkvlzjc taqbz gsov wqsij cusx gswkqm

Thursday, Mar 8, 2007, 11:53 PM

ezawrkdj tvrwiyla:

ebdlrgs nrlafecbi hwufn trxouakl vbxsq ncsjx lmxytdg

Thursday, Mar 8, 2007, 11:54 PM

ajns rvtdy:

dwupmlr jgdswxkoe uohsec pslqru spodmn fmsw vzcfbt [URL=]vztmw ekjqlx[/URL]

Thursday, Mar 8, 2007, 11:55 PM

ajns rvtdy:

dwupmlr jgdswxkoe uohsec pslqru spodmn fmsw vzcfbt [URL=]vztmw ekjqlx[/URL]

Thursday, Mar 8, 2007, 11:57 PM

fginys okxamehyl:

xtgcpkds jofm xiotwsd idhmp rebcn mayievrnx dlzvmip [URL][/URL] ghejw qebzghxfv

Thursday, Mar 8, 2007, 11:57 PM

comment on this post

HTML tags will be escaped.

Powered By ASP.NET

Hosted by SecureWebs