Wednesday, Nov 8, 2006, 7:24 PM
Our Long National Nightmare is Over
Since at least 2001 we've been stuck in a quagmire of missteps, indecision, corruption and the eroding of our freedoms. Some of us feared it would never end.
But the US House and Senate are now officially out of the hands of the Republicans, and that's cause for much rejoicing. Let the balloons drop and the dancing begin! It's a new age.
P.S. apologies to Mr. Petzold for ripping off his blog post, but when I saw it in my RSS reader, I thought that the above would be the subject of his latest essay and that we would finally have something on which to agree. It'll be my luck that he's a staunch Republican and I'll hear about my misguideness tomorrow... : )
59 comments on this post
Chris Sells:
Oh wait... that's not likely to stem the tide of anything, is it? : )
Wednesday, Nov 8, 2006, 7:28 PM
Andrew Shebanow:
Wednesday, Nov 8, 2006, 7:57 PM
Bob:
Then Sells comes along and has to drag politics into it after all...
Wednesday, Nov 8, 2006, 8:33 PM
Chris Sells:
Wednesday, Nov 8, 2006, 9:26 PM
Kory:
Wednesday, Nov 8, 2006, 10:28 PM
re::
As I told a friend today, we didn't vote for Democrats. We voted for change.
We voted for a rebuke of the policy of fear mongering as an excuse strip civil liberties.
We voted for accountability.
We voted against the suppression of debate on our policy towards Iraq.
It's about time that we recognize that "Stay the course" is not sound "strategery".
Now the ball's in the Democrats court to do better.
Wednesday, Nov 8, 2006, 11:13 PM
Kevin Daly:
Oh, and doing something about the whole "hey, let's see if we can make the climate like Venus" thing would be super too :-)
Thursday, Nov 9, 2006, 12:24 AM
Andrew Webb:
LOL - me too!
Thursday, Nov 9, 2006, 1:53 AM
Me:
Thursday, Nov 9, 2006, 4:25 AM
Chris:
http://www.theonion.com/content/node/28784/print/
Thursday, Nov 9, 2006, 4:25 AM
Greg Robinson:
This post has changed all that. I see no need to intrdocue politics in a technical blog. I come here for technical guidance, not for your political views.
Thanks for all the great tips and advise over the years, your arrogance has just lost you a reader.
Thursday, Nov 9, 2006, 5:05 AM
Greg Robinson:
Thursday, Nov 9, 2006, 5:08 AM
John Bush:
Thursday, Nov 9, 2006, 5:41 AM
Steven Cameron:
Thursday, Nov 9, 2006, 6:06 AM
Herb:
And, as minor correction to a previous post, people didn't vote for change, accountability, etc.; they voted for a promise of all of the above.
The only sign of hope is the re-election of Senator Lieberman, which does at least appear to show the people care about principle over party lines, at least a little.
Thursday, Nov 9, 2006, 6:25 AM
Just a reader:
However, some of us actually read your blog (and your books) for your insights into Microsoft development. We (speaking for other readers) don't care about your political opinions. They detract from the otherwise good commentary that you provide.
You mention a "quagmire of missteps, indecision, corruption and the eroding of our freedoms." The republicans have no monopoly on corruption, so I think that will be a wash. Missteps? Certainly. This is a new war. You can't possible enter it with all of the answers up front. You don't even know all of the questions yet. Indecision? Hardly. There has been no wavering in the committment to fight the war on terror. Eroding of freedoms? There is a price that must be paid for freedom. It isn't free. For example, you put up with airport screenings because it keeps some percentage of the bad guys off the planes. It's not foolproof by any means, but it helps. That's a price that you pay every day for the freedom to get on a plane. Likewise, there is a worldwide battle between terrorists and everyone else. Please take your head out of the sand and wake up! They (terrorists) attacked this country and declared war on us. If you wish to protect this country from attack while we are at war, you may need to give up certain freedoms. That's an acceptable compromise in order to maintain our safety. Better to possible lose some perceived freedoms and be alive than to suffer the alternative.
Good luck with the democrats in control. It will be interesting to see if they meet all of your expectations.
Thursday, Nov 9, 2006, 6:35 AM
John:
Thursday, Nov 9, 2006, 7:02 AM
Mitch Hall:
No matter which way you would have gone with such extreme language about the election - either way would have added salt to the wounds of someone. This post is like picketting a funeral for any conservatives in your audience - really bad form.
Thursday, Nov 9, 2006, 7:25 AM
David Cornelson:
I'm still sort of shocked. I really do feel that I've just been come out of some horrible nightmare.
I recall all too well following the recount news in 2000 with horror. I recall the mid-terms in 2002 when the Senate went back to the GOP. I recall the look on Bush's face when he was told about 9/11. I recall the beginning of an ill-advised war in Iraq and Donald Rumsfeld blowing off any need for a post-war plan. I recall reading about the 12 volumes of information on Iraq reconstruction that the State Department put together and Runsfeld threatened to fire anyone who mentioned them to his face again. I recall in 2004 when people re-elected Bush. I recall the nomination and approval of two very likely right-wing judges to the supreme court. I recall torture becoming a right of our president. I recall the abuse of our military code for the profit of Haliburton and other defense contractors. I recall our president saying he has every right to spy on the citizens of our country. I recall the president saying he can kidnap and torture anyone if they're even suspected of doing something he doesn't like (like expressing disagreement with our government).
I wish I had been dreaming all of those things.
At least we can try to repair it now.
DC
Thursday, Nov 9, 2006, 8:30 AM
Dave Lapierre:
I think you show poor form with your post. The topic is not consistent with the technical nature of your BLOG. It reminds me of the way Barbara Streisand used a recent concert to express her political views or the way celebrities use award acceptance speeches to make an off the cuff op-ed remark. You may not refer to yourself as Democrat or Republican but you certainly seem to be celebrating the Democratic victory. It is revealing of your character that you would profile an entire group as idiots simply because they have chosen to belong to a particular party. If you were given total power of the House and Senate would you have just fired all the Republicans? Would it not be better to review the performance of each individual and make your determination that way? Should the entire Vista developer team be fired because there were some missteps and indecisions that led to the release being years late? I truly think most politicians are trying to do the best they can just as most developers are trying to write good code. If there is such a thing as an average politician or an average developer or even an average driver then there will be a number of politicians, developers and drivers who are below average. I recall one time you wrote about how you had to take a driver safety class for some traffic violation. Should I refer to you as one of those idiot drivers because belong to a group of people that have had to take that class? Am I a good driver because I belong to the club that never had to take that class?
Every Congress regardless of party has had it's share of missteps, indecision and corruption. If you really want to do a good op-ed piece why not take a look at each individdual seat change and compare the new with the old rating them in a way that you might evaluate the resumes of potential job candidates. Then based on that make an argument that this election change is for the better or not. Then maybe you could even compare this election to other elections where control of Congress changed. For example do you expect more/less change from this election compared to say 1958 when the Democrats gained 49 seats in the House and 16 in the Senate?
You can do better.
Dave
Thursday, Nov 9, 2006, 9:17 AM
Rick:
Keep in mind, these people weren't voted IN as much as the the other folks were voted OUT.
Thursday, Nov 9, 2006, 9:48 AM
Brock:
Thursday, Nov 9, 2006, 9:49 AM
Shauna:
Thursday, Nov 9, 2006, 9:52 AM
Sean Chase:
Thursday, Nov 9, 2006, 10:26 AM
TSHAK:
Thursday, Nov 9, 2006, 10:28 AM
Rick:
Thursday, Nov 9, 2006, 10:47 AM
Just Will:
Thursday, Nov 9, 2006, 11:40 AM
Greg Graham:
Thursday, Nov 9, 2006, 1:10 PM
Miguel Correia:
Yes, terrorism is indeed a problem, but having gone to Iraq didn't make the world a safer place. On the contrary, it created a new terrorist incubator.
Bashing Chris Sells for posting is political opinion in his own blog reveals the intolerant nature of many conservatives. The strong feelings demonstrated along the bashing suggest these people's belief systems are deeply entrenched in denial.
Once again, congratulations America!
Thursday, Nov 9, 2006, 3:40 PM
Gram:
Gotta agree. So maybe you lose a few US readers for expressing your opinion - but probably no-one else on the planet!
Thursday, Nov 9, 2006, 5:50 PM
Jeff:
You are the owner of this blog. You are entitled to post whatever you want, and I completely respect that right. So, I am not going to lecture you about whether you should be posting personal opinions in a technical blog. Obviously, it is your decision.
However, you shouldn't be too surprised by the type of reactions seen here. It is simply a big turn off to a lot of readers when a blog that typically provides reliable technical information suddenly intermingles political commentary.
It is true that politics is an important topic in society, but it is a highly sensitive subject. People have exponentially differing opinions that also significantly vary in intensity. While some people may share your opinion, others may become severely offended by it.
Just my two cents...
Friday, Nov 10, 2006, 5:46 AM
Philip the Duck:
Funny how *his* political statements aren't met with the same kind of negative response this one was - does that tell us non-Americans something about the difference between US Republicans and Democrats with regard to tolerance for others different from themselves?
Keep up the good work, Chris.
Friday, Nov 10, 2006, 5:53 AM
Philip the Duck, again:
Friday, Nov 10, 2006, 5:57 AM
Michael Grant:
It is a pity we take politics so personally but while I may disagree with your political views, I will fight for your right to express them. This is still the greatest country on earth! Thanks for taking the risk to allow people the freedom to vent their feelings on your blog!
Friday, Nov 10, 2006, 6:30 AM
Carl:
This is really like a religion for you guys, huh?
One thing that you all seem to have forgotten, is that there is nobody out there that writes a blog for the readers, they do it for themselves...
Therefore, I guess that it won't be much of a shock that Chris probably won't lose any sleep over a disgruntled republican voter that just clicked delete in their aggregator... wow...
Of course, you'll all come back at some point in the future when you realise that arguing over political parties is even more ridiculous than arguing over religion...
I'm glad that us Brits aren't quite as anal about who runs our country - it's obviously taken us a lot less time to come to terms with the fact that red = blue, and every political party is exactly the same as the next...
It's nice when people feel strongly about a subject - unfortunately, the point at which they believe that gives them the right to impose those views on others, to me, is the point that turns to fanaticism....
This is just my opinion, but that's ok, because everyone is entitled to one.
C
Friday, Nov 10, 2006, 7:05 AM
Algori:
Friday, Nov 10, 2006, 7:07 AM
Lance:
Friday, Nov 10, 2006, 7:39 AM
Anonymous:
I know! Doesn't it suck for someone to use their own personal web site for their own personal opinions! The nerve...
I SAY:
Does it suck for someone to use an open comment area to express their opinion as well? The nerve of them. How dare an exchange of differeing ideas occur when we know that Chris must be absolutely correct.
Friday, Nov 10, 2006, 8:10 AM
Carl:
Friday, Nov 10, 2006, 8:41 AM
Mitch:
It will be interesting to see how the "new age" with the new "crop of idiots" pans out.
That being said, we should probably give Chris a break - I am sure he will see what a mistake this post was in this forum and get back to the quality posts we've come to expect.
Friday, Nov 10, 2006, 1:28 PM
:
Friday, Nov 10, 2006, 3:41 PM
Ian:
You *must* get right back to offering the free technical advice and insights that all of us freeloading readers have come to expect, nah, deserve, becuase we allow you to let us read your site.
You have been warned sir! No more personal opinions, just free technical content. Damn it, you think you pay for this domain name or something? Shame on you.
PS. Yay Democrats! Oops.
Sunday, Nov 12, 2006, 8:58 PM
Allen:
The GOP screwed up by not acting like they were in the Majority. They let the spineless Democrats run all over them while also getting away from their conservative views.
This is what the next two years will bring. Impeachment proceedings against the President. Bigger government (government solves all problems). Repealing of the tax cuts which has created a booming economy (for those of you who like higher taxes, no one is stopping you from sending in more of your money to the government. Write a check and send it in.). Increase the minimum wage. Run from Iraq (that's it. let's fight the terrorists in our country instead of fighting them in Iraq). It's sad that the Iranian leaders and terrorists leaders support the Democrats. Why is that? Whose side are the Democrats on? They are always happy when bad things happen to this country.
I always find it funny about the need to raise the minimum wage. What is it at now, $6.50? Why not make it $20, maybe $50 an hour? What would be wrong with that? What good does it do to only raise the minimum wage a couple of dollars? That doesn't help anyone. The private sector should not be told what they should pay an employee.
It's going to be an interesting couple of years.
Monday, Nov 13, 2006, 7:53 AM
John:
You think you're fighting 'terrorists' in Iraq?
Monday, Nov 13, 2006, 10:30 AM
Rick:
Monday, Nov 13, 2006, 11:19 AM
Jesse Ezell:
Monday, Nov 13, 2006, 1:37 PM
Miguel Correia:
So, where did the Republicans actually make America safer in face of Iran by going into Iraq? Maybe it's me, but I really don't get it.
Monday, Nov 13, 2006, 3:13 PM
Chris Sells:
P.S. Those of you in support of posting my opinions on my web site, thank you very much. Those of you advocating that I self-censor myself because of the needs of my audience, I support your right to have and to voice those opinions on this open forum.
Monday, Nov 13, 2006, 4:17 PM
Jesse Liberty:
There is a dangerous and bizarre notion in the technical community that writers are supposed to stick to technical subjects and keep our political opinions to ourselves; that we are uni-dimensional sock puppets whose moral imperatives have no place in the amoral world of information dispensing and that it is an imposition on our readers to provide our political opinions even on matters we feel strongly about.
The more I do, however (see http://www.simple-talk.com for an example of my own firestorm) the more liberating it is, and the more I realize how odd it is for us to think that we can compartmentalize our lives so completely.
In any case, I continue to admire your work and your writing, and I hope you won't let the flames get you down.
Best of luck.
-jesse
Monday, Nov 13, 2006, 5:32 PM
Jesse Ezell:
Monday, Nov 13, 2006, 10:42 PM
Anonymous:
Tuesday, Nov 14, 2006, 9:45 AM
Scooter (Dexter):
Tuesday, Nov 14, 2006, 10:19 AM
Chris Sells:
Tuesday, Nov 14, 2006, 12:39 PM
Allen:
As for Iran. Iran is the one stating they are working on a nuclear bomb. Looks like to me we are in an excellent position to go kick their ass too. The only way the radical muslims will be happy is when all non-muslims are dead. Hopefully you will understand that. Don't forget, we were the ones that were attacked. Remember 9/11 or are you one of those that believes Bush brought down the twin towers?
"You think you're fighting 'terrorists' in Iraq?" Hey John, who do you think we are fighting? You ever heard of Al Quaeda? That's the brilliance of the Iraq war. Make the terrorists come to us in Iraq so we can kill them there instead of us having to kill them here in this great country called America.
I don't like war anymore than anyone else, but there are times when a great nation must stand up and fight for freedom. Many men and women have given the ultimate sacrifice for this country. I would hate to think what would have happened back in WWI or WWII if the citizens of this country at that time didn't stand up for freedom. We wouldn't be the great country that we are now. Freedom takes sacrifice. God Bless.
Thanks Chris for giving us the opportunity to discuss such an important issue.
Tuesday, Nov 14, 2006, 7:24 PM
Jon Rowett:
oh well,
Thursday, Nov 16, 2006, 8:13 AM
Serge Boucher:
If not stupid, at least misinformed. Saddam was a ruthless dictator, but he headed a secular government. He gave women more rights and all but abolished Sharia courts. Al-Qaeda's stated goal is to remove all western influence in muslim countries and turn religious doctrine into law accross the arab world. Seems pretty obvious to me that Saddam and al-Qaeda wouldn't be on the best of terms.
But you don't have to trust me... the Senate Intelligence Committee agrees :
"The Senate Committee concluded that there was no evidence of any Iraqi support of al-Qaeda and that there was convincing evidence of hostility between the two entities."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sadam_Hussein
This particular statement was made in 2006, but the underlying fact, while not publicized in the United States, was well-known before the war started. Whether the war in Iraq was justified or not, it is a fact that the US government knowingly lied to the american people in order to gather popular support for the war. I agree with Chris : it's time for a change of command.
And on a completely unrelated topic : I read this blog because there's a bunch of really useful information on interesting (technical) subjects. I am *not* trying to build a long-standing relationship with the author ;-) Which means that I don't care at all about his political views as long as his technical posts stay interesting. Funny how many people don't seem to think that way...
Monday, Nov 20, 2006, 11:35 AM
Chris Sells:
Monday, Nov 20, 2006, 5:53 PM
Rory:
I've read your stuff for years - you were my inspiration to get involved with the community.
Then you had to go and post *this*...
...which reminds me of why I've always liked you so much :)
(And don't worry about the people who say they aren't reading anymore - let's face it - they came here for technical help because they're either too dumb or too lazy to figure things out by themselves, so they'll be back (if they ever left in the first place).)
It's been a really long time since I've seen geeks act like such a bunch of thin-skinned babies - at *least* three or four hours.
It's a mad, mad world, Chris.
But you get my vote.
For what, I don't know. You just get it.
People who are intolerant of your opinions are people who aren't worth knowing in the first place, and they aren't deserving of the free tidbits of thinklings you've dropped out here over the years.
Someone with real backbone would stand up and argue the point - using his/her own name, I might add - or accept differences and move on.
Fortunately, you'll only lose a few readers if any (I've been through this crap myself), and the bright side will be a more targeted audience of people who aren't so terrified of opposing viewpoints that they have to run off at the first sign of anything different.
After all these years, dawgg, you're still one of my heroes.
Sunday, Nov 26, 2006, 7:23 PM
Rich:
Chris, I did the exact same thing for the first time ever in my life - I voted a straight Democrat ticket. I'm sure some decent Republicans lost their jobs but I just don't care right now.
I'm angry about so many things with this administration. I'm angry with their very ugly politics on gay marriage. I'm angry with their disregard for our laws. I'm angry with their arrogance. And I'm just plain tired of their incompetence.
Good riddance!
Monday, Nov 27, 2006, 3:40 PM




