PM Skill #7: Use That Meeting Time!
It's very easy, as the PM, to not want to waste team time in a meeting, letting folks go when there's still 30 minutes left. In fact, lots of folks will praise you for your short meetings. That's fine if all of the work for that meeting has been done, e.g. everyone's reported their status, all of the open questions have been decided, etc.
However, it's often the case that in these meetings, other issues will come up to be discussed in future meetings to be scheduled at another time. Don't let your concern for your team mates' free time tempt you to let 'em go! It's hard enough to get the folks you need together in a room. Once you've got 'em there, use 'em.
For example, if you've got the team together for weekly status that's scheduled for 60 minutes, it often only takes 30 minutes. In that 30 minutes, you may decide that a subset of the team needs to get together for an hour design discussion on whether to spinning text boxes to your next software project. As a dutiful PM (aka "mom"), you'll often find yourself saying, "Sure -- I'll set that up." Then it's your job to find an hour on everyone's calendar while that issue remains open and the project drags on.
Don't do it! Instead, peel off the folks in the status meeting that need to be in the "hour design discussion" and have the meeting right then and there. You've already scheduled the weekly status for 60 minutes, so you know those folks are free and just dying to get back to reading email in piece in their office -- put 'em to work instead! Who the hell knows how long a design discussion is going to take anyway? It's just as likely to go under an hour as over, so you might be able to wrap up the issue right then and there, skipping the need for another meeting altogether. Believe me, your team mates will thank you for that!
Chris Sells
,
Friday, February 03, 2006 4:59 PM
I disagree. I prefer to give people enough notice so they have time to prepare their thoughts prior to a meeting. I let them know I expect them to come prepared or not bother showing up. I don't think the purpose of a meeting should be to begin one's thinking on a topic, out loud, in committee. When someone does their initial thinking on a topic right in front of me- I see that as a waste of my time. The trade off for expecting people to organize their thoughts ahead of time is to give people enough notice. No stealth meetings!
Erik,
Monday, February 06, 2006 8:24 AM
what's "stealth" about getting to the end of a meeting w/ time left in the hour, having the people you need in the room to tackle another issue and tackling it?
Chris Sells,
Wednesday, February 08, 2006 11:52 AM
 Reply
to this news
Marquee de Sells
|